On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:30:21 GMT, kabutz <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:

> embarrassingly parallelizable

Having looked at [embarrassingly 
parallel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarrassingly_parallel), I'm not 
certain that this particular problem would qualify. The algorithm is easy to 
parallelize, but in the end we still have some rather large numbers, so memory 
will be our primary dominator. I'd expect to see a linear speedup if it was 
"perfectly parallel", but this does not come close to that.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6409

Reply via email to