On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:15:37 GMT, kabutz <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>>> > embarrassingly parallelizable >>> >>> Having looked at [embarrassingly >>> parallel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarrassingly_parallel), I'm not >>> certain that this particular problem would qualify. The algorithm is easy >>> to parallelize, but in the end we still have some rather large numbers, so >>> memory will be our primary dominator. I'd expect to see a linear speedup if >>> it was "perfectly parallel", but this does not come close to that. >> >> Ok, fair point, to avoid possible confusion I have removed "embarrassingly". >> I don't think we need to refer to other algorithms. > > Hi @PaulSandoz is there anything else that we need to do? Or is this in the > hopper for Java 19 already? @kabutz please see comments from Joe on the [CSR](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8278886), which should be easy to address (i can update the CSR after you make changes). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6409
