On Sat, 6 Aug 2022 08:11:53 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Stuart Marks has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   More edits from Alex's suggestions.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java line 73:
> 
>> 71:  * or if its {@code run} method completes abruptly and the appropriate
>> 72:  * {@linkplain Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler uncaught exception 
>> handler} completes
>> 73:  * normally or abruptly. With no code left to run, the thread has 
>> completed execution.
> 
> I'm in two minds about introducing the UHE in paragraph 3 but probably okay 
> as you kinda have to mention it when defining termination. There's a lot more 
> to this story when you have agents in the picture but I'll not go there. I 
> wonder if we can do something with the last sentence that includes the word 
> "terminated". We use "terminated" in several places and it would be clearer 
> if this sentence were to end with something like "... the thread has 
> completes execution, and is terminated" (it could link to isAlive or 
> Thread.State#TERMINATED).
> 
> Given that the join method is introduced as the method to wait for a thread 
> to terminate then it could be part of this paragraph rather than a single 
> sentence paragraph.

I would also suggest that the join() sentence simply be the last sentence of 
the above paragraph:

> The join method can be be used to wait for a thread to terminate.

> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Thread.java line 104:
> 
>> 102:  * The <a href="Runtime.html#shutdown">shutdown sequence</a> begins 
>> when all started
>> 103:  * non-daemon threads have terminated. Unstarted non-daemon threads do 
>> not prevent
>> 104:  * the shutdown sequence from commencing. Invoking the {@linkplain 
>> Runtime#exit(int)}
> 
> I think this is the only usage of "commencing", everywhere else uses 
> "beginning" or "begin the shutdown sequence".

"initiated" is also used.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9437

Reply via email to