On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 09:35:56 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > I see that Alan suggested that we take up the `jar -i` deprecation in a > > separate PR. I think that simplifies the work in this PR. > > Yes, there are options for `jar -i` that include "leave it as is", have the > option create the index and emit a warning that the feature is deprecated, or > remove the index creation and emit a warning that it is ignored. I don't > think we should change "jar -i` to fail with an error as that would break > existing scripts. None of these directions impact the JAR file spec or the > API docs, it's just the jar tool so I think can be separated to another PR. Agree, we should handle this separately. If we are thinking of emitting a warning, we probably should do that in = JDK 22 as that could break tests with golden files so we might want to give a heads up in JDK 21 before doing this ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13158#issuecomment-1487416516
