On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:02:52 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> What I suggest is to prepare the array only once (in the static block as it > is now), but have each class that use it encapsulate is own copy - obtained > from clone(). Surely 256 shorts is not so large that we can't have two arrays? The point is that it doesn't make any sense, so I don't feel like we should pay anything for it. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14578#discussion_r1243812535
