On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 01:15:54 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> early experimental version of the bytecode library is bundled under:
>> test/jdk/lib/testlibrary/bytecode
>>
>> following tests reference it:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/common/test/java/lang/invoke/lib/InstructionHelper.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyWithGarbageTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyReturnPrimitiveTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyWrongType.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyNestedTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyStaticArgumentsTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/BootstrapMethodJumboArgsTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/ConstantBootstrapsTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyRepeatFailedResolution.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyBSMInvocation.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyTypeValidationTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyBSMValidationTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyNameValidationTest.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyBSMException.java
>> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/condy/CondyInterfaceWithOverpassMethods.java
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/common/test/java/lang/invoke/lib/InstructionHelper.java
> line 71:
>
>> 69: for (int i = 0; i <
>> type.parameterCount(); i++) {
>> 70:
>> codeBuilder.loadInstruction(TypeKind.fromDescriptor(
>> 71:
>> type.parameterType(i).descriptorString()), i);
>
> You can just use `TypeKind.from(type.parameterType(i))`
I can't see such as method.
> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/common/test/java/lang/invoke/lib/InstructionHelper.java
> line 76:
>
>> 74:
>> MethodHandleDesc.ofMethod(
>> 75:
>> DirectMethodHandleDesc.Kind.STATIC,
>> 76:
>> ClassDesc.of(l.lookupClass().getCanonicalName()),
>
> Despite this being part of the original code, `getCanonicalName` is
> unreliable for bytecode engineering, for it cannot distinguish packages from
> nested/inner classes.
I will use ClassDesc.ofDescriptor and passes the descriptor string of the type.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16268#discussion_r1371686240
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16268#discussion_r1371553152
