> Can I please get a review of this doc-only change which updates the javadoc 
> of several classes in `java.util.jar` and `java.util.zip` to specify their 
> behaviour when `null` arguments are passed to the constructor or methods of 
> those classes?
> 
> For these updated classes, I have individually checked that they indeed throw 
> a `NullPointerException` when `null` is passed to their constructor or 
> methods. The couple of places where `null` is accepted have been updated to 
> mention that `null` is allowed.

Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Lance's review - replace can cause with will cause

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17728/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17728/files/e4c724fc..f92c5726

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17728&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17728&range=01-02

  Stats: 6 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 6 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17728.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17728/head:pull/17728

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17728

Reply via email to