On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 17:51:20 GMT, Doug Lea <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 143:
> 141: * that take too long. The scheduled functions or actions may create
> 142: * and invoke other {@linkplain ForkJoinTask ForkJoinTasks}. Delayed
> 143: * actions become <em>enabled</em> for execution and behave as ordinary
> submitted
Does it make sense to retain `<em>`?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25880#discussion_r2155236845
