On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:51:35 GMT, Doug Lea <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @pavelrappo Indeed, "Reactive Streams" would be better. Perhaps something
>> like this:
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> * fully conform to the Reactive Streams specification.
>
> Thanks; done.
Nit of a nit: would it make sense to also change "reactive-streams" to
"Reactive Streams" earlier in that same file:
* <p>These interfaces correspond to the <a
* href="http://www.reactive-streams.org/";> reactive-streams</a>
* specification.
"reactive-streams" is the domain, the maven artifact, and the repo name. It's
not the specification or project name, which are "Reactive Streams".
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25880#discussion_r2158976689
