On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 18:25:39 GMT, Pavel Rappo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
>> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 143:
>
>> 141: * that take too long. The scheduled functions or actions may create
>> 142: * and invoke other {@linkplain ForkJoinTask ForkJoinTasks}. Delayed
>> 143: * actions become <em>enabled</em> for execution and behave as ordinary
>> submitted
>
> Does it make sense to retain `<em>`?
Might make sense to remove it if we always spell it out at "enabled for
execution"
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25880#discussion_r2156618787
