On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:41:27 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Unsafe throws IAE for misusing static vs instance fields, and it's revealed 
>> that AtomicXxxFieldUpdaters are using this mechanism to reject static 
>> fields. This is not a good practice, but we can at least document this so we 
>> don't accidentally introduce problems.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Test to verify observed internal unsafe behaviors

src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.java
 line 405:

> 403:                 throw new IllegalArgumentException("Must be volatile 
> type");
> 404: 
> 405:             if (Modifier.isStatic(modifiers))

Can we break out the Modifier tests in the three updater classes to a common 
method?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2189548142

Reply via email to