On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:41:27 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Unsafe throws IAE for misusing static vs instance fields, and it's revealed >> that AtomicXxxFieldUpdaters are using this mechanism to reject static >> fields. This is not a good practice, but we can at least document this so we >> don't accidentally introduce problems. > > Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Test to verify observed internal unsafe behaviors src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.java line 405: > 403: throw new IllegalArgumentException("Must be volatile > type"); > 404: > 405: if (Modifier.isStatic(modifiers)) Can we break out the Modifier tests in the three updater classes to a common method? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2189548142