On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:41:27 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Unsafe throws IAE for misusing static vs instance fields, and it's revealed
>> that AtomicXxxFieldUpdaters are using this mechanism to reject static
>> fields. This is not a good practice, but we can at least document this so we
>> don't accidentally introduce problems.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Test to verify observed internal unsafe behaviors
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.java
line 407:
> 405: if (Modifier.isStatic(modifiers))
> 406: throw new IllegalArgumentException("Must not be a static
> field");
> 407:
@viktorklang-ora @DougLea Should we update the Atomic*FieldUpdater to specify
the IAE when the factory method is called with a static Field?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25945#discussion_r2189553083
