On Sat, 8 Nov 2025 04:21:17 GMT, Alexander Matveev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> - Added JDK specific keys/values to Info.plist of embedded runtime. >> - Modified `setFakeRuntime()` not to include `bin` folder. By default it was >> always included, but generated embedded runtime by default does not have >> `bin` folder. As a result `CustomInfoPListTest` failed. >> - Updated `CustomInfoPListTest` to test Info.plist with `bin` folder. > > Alexander Matveev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to > a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains seven commits: > > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into JDK-8363980 > - 8363980: [macos] Add JDK specific keys/values to Info.plist of embedded > runtime [v3] > - 8363980: [macos] Add JDK specific keys/values to Info.plist of embedded > runtime [v2] > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into JDK-8363980 > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into JDK-8363980 > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into JDK-8363980 > - 8363980: [macos] Add JDK specific keys/values to Info.plist of embedded > runtime 8363980: [macos] Add JDK specific keys/values to Info.plist of embedded runtime [v4] - Added PList check with minor modification to skip check if runtime directory does not exists. - Updated CustomInfoPListTest.java to include `JavaVM` key. - `useRuntimeInfoPlist` will also check for existence of `bin` folder to cover cases when runtime is provided via `--runtime-image`. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28033#issuecomment-3544629521
