On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 05:13:38 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Implementation of preview-mode support for jimage modules file, migrated 
>> from Valhalla related work (see JDK-8352750).
>> 
>> This PR (the first of several) migrates work from Valhalla (lworld) to the 
>> JDK mainline repository in relation to "preview mode" support. It affects 
>> the creation and reading of the jimage file, both in Java 
>> (BasicImageReader/ImageReader) and C++ (imageFile.xpp/jimage.xpp).
>> 
>> Preview mode is a mechanism by which alternate version of JDK class files 
>> and resources can be made available for class loading and reflection when 
>> the '--enable-preview' flag is passed to the runtime.
>> 
>> Alternate classes/resource appear in each module under the:
>> 
>> /<module>/META-INF/preview/<path-to>/<resource-or-class>
>> 
>> and replace the original:
>> 
>> /<module>/<path-to>/<resource-or-class>
>> 
>> files when preview mode is enabled.
>> 
>> While initially useful for Valhalla work, this mechanism will be used for 
>> other cases where preview features (in the JEP 12 sense) require alternate 
>> classes/resources to be provided. None of the changes in this (or the 
>> follow-up PRs) are Valhalla specific.
>> 
>> In this PR:
>> * the writing of jimage files is modified to recognize and handle preview 
>> mode paths
>> * flags in the jimage file are added or modified to support preview mode 
>> efficiently
>> * (C++) the class loader is modified to permit reading preview versions of 
>> classes
>> * (Java) the image reader and associated JRT file-system classes are 
>> modified to permit reading preview files
>> * unit tests are added to ensure preview mode works as expected when enabled
>> * (temporary) any code calling into the affected API (other than tests) 
>> specifies that preview mode is disabled
>> 
>> Future PRs will add the plumbing to enable preview mode correctly, but with 
>> the PR there should be no observable change in behaviour (especially since 
>> no preview classes or resources are being supplied at this point).
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/jimage/ImageReader.java line 253:
> 
>> 251:             public int hashCode() {
>> 252:                 return imagePath.hashCode() ^ 
>> Boolean.hashCode(previewMode);
>> 253:             }
> 
> Given what the `ReaderKey` is, would making `ReaderKey` a `record` be useful? 
> That would also avoid having to explicitly implement the equals/hashcode.

Never mind, please ignore that comment. For a moment I forgot that this code 
needs to be compilable with Java 8.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29414#discussion_r2922339639

Reply via email to