On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 13:40:38 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to introduce a new 
> jtreg test to cover the case where the underlying `InputStream` of a 
> `GZIPInputStream` blocks?
> 
> This test should help us catch any future regressions like the one reported 
> recently in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8377896. In fact, this test 
> when run against a JDK version which has the changes from 
> http://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7036144, does indeed reproduce the 
> JDK-8377896 issue. 
> 
> The test passes in the current mainline.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

test/jdk/java/util/zip/GZIP/GZIPOverBlockingStreams.java line 69:

> 67:     private static final Random random = RandomFactory.getRandom();
> 68:     private static final String MEMBER_CONTENT_FORMAT =
> 69:             "Hello member %d, greetings from Java " + 
> System.getProperty("java.version") + "\n";

Out of curiosity, could including `System.getProperty("java.version")` risk 
that the test becomes unstable between Java versions?

Would it be better to obtain any 'random' data from the already existing 
`random`?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31369#discussion_r3362315961

Reply via email to