> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to introduce a new 
> jtreg test to cover the case where the underlying `InputStream` of a 
> `GZIPInputStream` blocks?
> 
> This test should help us catch any future regressions like the one reported 
> recently in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8377896. In fact, this test 
> when run against a JDK version which has the changes from 
> http://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7036144, does indeed reproduce the 
> JDK-8377896 issue. 
> 
> The test passes in the current mainline.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits since 
the last revision:

 - ignore socket connections from unexpected clients
 - merge latest from master branch
 - remove java version from text message in test
 - merge latest from master branch
 - 8385891: Introduce a test for GZIPInputStream whose underlying stream is a 
blocking InputStream

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31369/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31369/files/cf396712..184451d7

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31369&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31369&range=01-02

  Stats: 58055 lines in 382 files changed: 55283 ins; 1346 del; 1426 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31369.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/31369/head:pull/31369

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31369

Reply via email to