On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 15:24:30 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If you permit, I would like to retain the static cost adjustments. They are >> functionally harmless and act as a safeguard against cost-driven selection >> of the component matcher rules, which this patch marks as high cost, during >> the labeling phase. > > It is better to remove these cost adjustment. Addressed, matcher is able to select newly added rules without cost so removed explicit cost. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30928#discussion_r3553183428
