On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 10:48 R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 17:50:53 +0000, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > If people are that worried, we could do a daily dump of the data. But > > unless we can have all GitHub-related comments to an issue not trigger an > > email update I don't think that's feasible as it would mean two emails > for > > every PR comment; one from GitHub and one from b.p.o. > > We can fairly easily have all github-originated comments not trigger an > email to the nosy list. We'd just need to add a check for the > originating email address to the nosy reaction detector. Even nicer > would be to make it a per-user setting (I'd rather get the emails from > b.p.o. and disable them on github, myself), but that would be a bit more > work. > > It would be nice to have *all* of the discussion in one place. > If someone wants to put the work in to make that happen then that's fine by me, but I do consider this a nicety and not a blocker. We haven't had code review comments go into b.p.o on Rietveld either so this isn't that far off from what we have now, especially if we block the transition on adding a link back to the GitHub PR through a web hook.
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
