On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 at 13:21 Alexander Belopolsky < [email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote: > > bpo NNNN ("bpo" stands for "bugs.python.org") > > > Shouldn't it be bpo-NNNN for consistency with gh-NNNN? > It could be. It's really up to us as I've never seen anyone actually use GH-NNNN in the wild (I honestly didn't know about it until I pulled up the docs to respond to Matthias).
_______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
