On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 at 13:21 Alexander Belopolsky <
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
>
> bpo NNNN ("bpo" stands for "bugs.python.org")
>
>
> Shouldn't it be bpo-NNNN for consistency with gh-NNNN?
>
It could be. It's really up to us as I've never seen anyone actually use
GH-NNNN in the wild (I honestly didn't know about it until I pulled up the
docs to respond to Matthias).
_______________________________________________
core-workflow mailing list
core-workflow@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct:
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
