there is no "stable" branch for upstream edk2 though. Previously, coreboot used an arbitrary commit as stable, and applied ~7 patches on top if it to make it functional. Even the UDK201x branches don't boot without patches
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 3:30 PM Lance Zhao <lance.z...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tianocore master branch build from edk2 will break, but that had been > quite some time. Stable branch is working fine though. > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 3:28 AM Matt DeVillier <matt.devill...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 1:27 PM Mike Banon <mikeb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, regarding the significant changes: " ### Tianocore UEFI >>> integrated as payload " . I hope it doesn't mean that Tianocore will >>> become the default payload, since there are ideological/technical >>> reasons against this ( I think there's a significant overlap between >>> the groups of people who love / interested in coreboot and hate UEFI ) >>> >> >> the change could be reworded better I think: instead of the stable tag >> for Tianocore being pulled from the upstream edk2 github repo and a series >> of patches applied, it's now pulled directly from my fork/repo, which is >> actually functional on most (x86_64) devices. A few tweaks (like >> customizable boot splash) were added as well. >> >> there is no change to the default payload, only to the defaults for >> Tianocore >> _______________________________________________ >> coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org >> >
_______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
