Okay, I returned your boards but added a note that "no board_status report yet". Hopefully you could submit them in the near future, at least for the archival purposes. And there's a similar question to someone else who added "Asus P8H61-M Pro" despite that the latest report for it is one year ago. > The default config should always be a known good config, unless the > board isn't well maintained. Needing a specific "good config" is a > sign of unattended bugs. Not necessarily: it could be that a default config is bootable for some board but still somehow inferior. For example, it may boot but without showing anything on a display, because no VGABIOS specified or provided. Or i.e. it may be hard to convince the people to enable some config by default despite it being useful, e.g. a coreinfo secondary payload. So board_status report is a great way to promote your nice config, and hopefully the people would share them more
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:28 PM Matt DeVillier <matt.devill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I added those devices, all of which I have in my possession and were tested > over the weekend with TOT. I'd not yet had a chance to upload board status > for them, but figured knowing a good range of platforms/boards were known > working just prior to release was useful (and the purpose of the list) > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:14 AM Mike Banon <mikeb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just noticed that someone included i.e. some Purism Librem devices to >> a " Recently tested mainboards: " section - but, when I check >> https://review.coreboot.org/cgit/board-status.git/log/purism , the >> latest board status for Purism happened even before 4.9 ! And without >> a recent enough _public_ "board status" report - containing the >> important info about your build and its' complete configuration - I >> don't think we could include them to a "recently tested" list, since >> the other users won't have a chance to reproduce your build by using >> your configuration. Same question regarding some other of these >> additions, so removing them from a " Recently tested mainboards: " >> list, but of course they could be re-added if someone will submit a >> board_status reports from them. >> >> We would like to encourage the board status reporting, and relying on >> the word of users ( "I tested X board and it worked" ) would not help >> us to collect the known good configs at our coreboot/board_status >> repository. >> >> To submit a board status report for your board, please run a >> ./coreboot/util/board_status/board_status.sh script on it. >> >> Removed: >> * Purism Librem 13 v1 >> * Purism Librem 15 v2 >> * Purism Librem 13 v2/v3 >> * Purism Librem 15 v3 >> * Purism Librem 13 v4 >> * Purism Librem 15 v4 >> * Samsung Chromebook 3 (google/celes) >> * Acer Chromebook R11 (google/cyan) >> * Google Chromebook Pixel 2013 (google/link) >> * Toshiba Chromebook 2 (2014) (google/swanky) >> * Dell Chromebook 13 7310 (google/lulu) >> * Dell Inspiron Chromebook 14 (google/nami) >> * Acer Chromebook 14 (google/edgar) >> * HP Chromebook 13 G1 (google/chell) >> * Asus Chromebox CN60 (google/panther) >> * Asus Chromebox CN62 (google/guado) >> * Asus Chromebox CN65 (google/fizz) _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org