On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:32:53 +0200 Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote:
> Based on Carsten's input, CBOR Core now refers to embedded signatures. > This is also the definition used for PDF files which is a major application > using embedded signatures. Embedded signatures is a logical choice for > designs where the document/message/application is king. > > What's missing is a unique label for the embedded signature object, like > simple(88). Having an application-defined label is certainly not a > showstopper but it would be cool being able to write > > sign(applicationObject) > > rather than > > sign(embeddedSignatureLabel, applicationObject) Why it have to be simple() value instead of a tag? -- WBR, @nuclight _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
