Or you can just use known values. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/22k65alB3pa6xWo4Fc2qbyMyHus/
~ Wolf > On Apr 16, 2025, at 5:01 AM, Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 05:32:53 +0200 > Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Based on Carsten's input, CBOR Core now refers to embedded signatures. >> This is also the definition used for PDF files which is a major application >> using embedded signatures. Embedded signatures is a logical choice for >> designs where the document/message/application is king. >> >> What's missing is a unique label for the embedded signature object, like >> simple(88). Having an application-defined label is certainly not a >> showstopper but it would be cool being able to write >> >> sign(applicationObject) >> >> rather than >> >> sign(embeddedSignatureLabel, applicationObject) > > Why it have to be simple() value instead of a tag? > > -- > WBR, @nuclight > > _______________________________________________ > CBOR mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
