On 16. Apr 2025, at 15:00, Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I fear such approach will lead to quick exhaustion of simple()'s.
We have 224 1+1 values ready for allocation. If we don’t want to exhaust these in the next 50 years, we can allocate about 4 per year. I’m pretty sure the designated expert will issue a wake-up call when there is a danger of approaching this rate. While there is no way to define larger simple values than simple(255), the tag + detail approach will still be available after their exhaustion. The 1+1 values should be used for applications that can make good use of the conciseness. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
