Hmm, you're right my statement was kind of confusing--because I have used low ballpark figures (200$ city, 100$ village). Such values are on the fair side. Social enough in spirit (meaning you're not rolling in bank notes).
Nevertheless I feel it can be lowered still. 100 members at 200$ equals 20000$ cash monthly, which kind of sounds much more than "enough" at many locations. Extremely dependent on location, this business, and on time too. Like realestate I guess. Still studying this. * * * I read the article! After all it's Sunday, and I took a break. The article is sensationalist and lacking, like most media. What it lacks is the (necessary) integrative view of coworking. But the details are right, and have the potential to scare away some people, maybe atract others, while yet infuriating others... The article also sounds confusing. On one hand it sounds partial against coworking, maybe the author had a bad experience. On the other hand it depicts coworking as a very profitable business, which maybe will send investors that way (only to close doors after a year because they ignore the community aspect). -- Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
