On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 08:31:07AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> 
> >Funny you should mention that. I've been slowly working through the
> >rewrite of YACSmoke. One of the aspects that I've been thinking  
> >about is
> >having CPAN Testers run the often disputed "pod.t" and "podcover.t"  
> >type
> >tests.
> 
> Yecch!  I particularly dislike the pod.t and podcover.t tests.  I  
> specifically do not include them as default selections in  
> ExtUtils::ModuleMaker.

I can appreciate that podcover.t might not be appropriate, but the pod.t
would be. Having well formed POD as documentation is standard good
practice, or at least it should be.

> >However, the major problem I can see with that is if a distribution is
> >well respected, but fails these tests. I can see a huge backlash.
> 
> Starting with me.

Hence why I suggested having a separate server that collated these
additional tests that were not part of any report sent to the CPAN
Testers server. Provided that tests were appropriate, it would be good
to having something that required running the distribution that fed into
CPANTS. However, what is appropriate, and who decides that, are two
questions for another time :)

As stated, I only mentioned these as something to perhaps think about
for the future, as CPAN Testers are in the postion to be actually
running the tests anyway. CPANTS isn't.

> But once you start adding "kwalitee" features, you diverge from your  
> core mission in a misguided attempt to be all things to all people.

I don't believe we are. The core mission is to give someone planning to
install a distribution a heads up as to whether there might be any
issues. The side effect of informing the author has always been just
that, a side effect :)

If the author isn't testing whether their distribution is broken, then
the CPAN Testers could potentially do that. However, I do think these
are perhaps metrics that are better fed to something like CPANTS, or
possibly a service that can be requested by the author, once we have the
admin facility for CPAN Testers.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org>
Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk>


Reply via email to