Hi Jonah, I have rebuilt my release update site, though, anything except reddeer bundles timestamps have changed, as expected. But to initiate an aggregator validation I have prepared a gerrit commit (without actual change to aggrcon file) [1]. I can probably wait for [2] WTP change to rebase and rerun to make sure we are good.
[1]: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181811 [2]: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181810 On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:50 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's > contribution based on the jetty snapshot. > > I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the source > bundle issue that Sravan identified. > > If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or provide me > with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of everything in > SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report back to Jetty > so they can make their release. > > Thanks > Jonah > ~~~ > Jonah Graham > Kichwa Coders > www.kichwacoders.com > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti < > sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is >> issue in the source bundles as they contain temporary files >> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165 >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Sravan >> >> >> >> *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36 >> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED >> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the >> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha >> >> >> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> >> >> >> The snapshot is ready >> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jonah >> >> >> >> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> >> We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part >> thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. >> >> >> >> I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has >> slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) >> have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). >> >> >> >> The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( >> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that >> fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE >> package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. >> >> >> >> To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively test >> that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a further >> 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. >> >> >> >> RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of >> everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). >> >> >> >> Any suggestions are very welcome. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Jonah >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after RedDeer >> is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty should be >> built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating all deps >> in all project, though, in quite late time. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ondre/Nitin, >> >> >> >> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 >> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think >> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Jonah >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Ondrej, >> >> >> >> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from >> reddeer. >> >> >> >> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 >> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j >> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found >> >> >> >> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally >> breaking WTP. >> >> >> >> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there >> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a >> resolution of WTP first. >> >> >> >> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jonah >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this >> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can >> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my >> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle >> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed. >> >> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in release, >> not sure if that can help. >> >> [1]: >> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console >> >> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >> wrote: >> >> Ondrej, >> >> >> >> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 >> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from >> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. >> >> >> >> Markus, >> >> >> >> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean >> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects, >> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and >> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release >> entirely. >> >> >> >> Nitin, >> >> >> >> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is >> still publishing slf4j 2.0. >> >> >> >> Jonah >> >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP >> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I >> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right? >> >> >> >> [1]: >> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> >> wrote: >> >> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because >> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for >> building. I will try that now. >> >> >> >> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is now >> referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to >> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Markus >> >> >> >> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> >> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks >> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't >> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse >> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version. >> >> >> >> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel >> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or >> jetty 10 from other sources. >> >> >> >> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to >> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel >> please. >> >> >> >> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has >> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 contributed >> to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output repo! >> >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> Jonah >> >> >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
