👍 I was curious whether there is any changes to rerdeer needed going forward now that it isn't republishing SLF4J alpha.
Perhaps there is nothing more needed. I assume the WTP update is coming soon. Nitin, let me know if you need anything in this regard. Thanks Jonah On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 18:37 Ondrej Dockal, <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Jonah, > > I have rebuilt my release update site, though, anything except reddeer > bundles timestamps have changed, as expected. But to initiate > an aggregator validation I have prepared a gerrit commit (without actual > change to aggrcon file) [1]. I can probably wait for [2] WTP change to > rebase and rerun to make sure we are good. > > [1]: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181811 > [2]: https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181810 > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:50 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> > wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Sravan has provided me with a link to what should represent Platform's >> contribution based on the jetty snapshot. >> >> I don't think we need to wait for a respin of the snapshot for the source >> bundle issue that Sravan identified. >> >> If other projects (RAP / Webtools/ Reddeer) can do the same, or provide >> me with build instructions I can smoke test the integration of everything >> in SimRel/EPP and make sure it all looks good and try to report back to >> Jetty so they can make their release. >> >> Thanks >> Jonah >> ~~~ >> Jonah Graham >> Kichwa Coders >> www.kichwacoders.com >> >> >> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:26, Sravan K Lakkimsetti < >> sravankum...@in.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> Triggered a platform build with latest 10.0.5-SNAPSHOT. But there is >>> issue in the source bundles as they contain temporary files >>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858764165 >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Sravan >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> *Sent:* 10 June 2021 21:36 >>> *To:* Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> >>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] ACTION REQUIRED >>> from RAP / REDDEER / WEBTOOLS - respin of Eclipse Platform RC2a and the >>> status on removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The snapshot is ready >>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6354#issuecomment-858733158 >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu., Jun. 10, 2021, 10:23 Jonah Graham, <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> We are making very good progress on resolving this issue, in no part >>> thanks to everyone that has been super responsive in updating their bits. >>> >>> >>> >>> I checked all the EPP packages and (as expected) only JEE has >>> slf4j.api_2.0.0.alpha1.jar. All the packages (also as expected) >>> have org.slf4j.api_1.7.30.v20200204-2150.jar (including JEE). >>> >>> >>> >>> The Jetty project is just about to push out a snapshot ( >>> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/6390) of 10.0.5 that >>> fully resolves the slf4j 2.0.0 alpha1 dependency so that the SimRel and JEE >>> package won't have alpha1 jar anymore. >>> >>> >>> >>> To reduce the change of a turnaround time again we can collectively test >>> that the 10.0.5 snapshot resolves all the issues. Note that this a further >>> 10.0.5 snapshot than we had yesterday. >>> >>> >>> >>> RIght now, I don't know how to do this test without a full respin of >>> everything (platform , redeer(?) , webtools, rap). >>> >>> >>> >>> Any suggestions are very welcome. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:56, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Jonah, thanks for taking care of this. If we will revert it after >>> RedDeer is pushed, I think it is safe to give it a try. Also, If Jetty >>> should be built somewhere with a fix it might provide a space for updating >>> all deps in all project, though, in quite late time. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:45 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ondre/Nitin, >>> >>> >>> >>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build/+/181738 >>> decouples the reddeer contribution from webtools which means if you think >>> it is ok you can merge that so reddeer can be merged. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:25, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ondrej, >>> >>> >>> >>> AFAICT the problem is that WTP is also pulling in org.slf4j 2.0 from >>> reddeer. >>> >>> >>> >>> 15:53:01 [0]Missing requirement: Jetty :: JNDI Naming 10.0.4 >>> (org.eclipse.jetty.jndi 10.0.4) requires 'java.package; org.slf4j >>> [2.0.0,3.0.0)' but it could not be found >>> >>> >>> >>> So because you are (correctly) removing slf4j 2.0, it is unintentionally >>> breaking WTP. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nitin is working on fixing up the WTP contribution. I don't think there >>> is actually anything wrong with reddeer's contribution, we just need a >>> resolution of WTP first. >>> >>> >>> >>> I will push a patch that verifies the above in a moment. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 16:15, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Unfortunately, I am still not able to pass aggregator validation, this >>> time it is jetty complaining about missing org.slf4j [2.0.0,3.0.0) as can >>> be seen in [1]. I am not really sure about what I can do about it from my >>> side. There is a reopened bugzilla [2] and PR on jetty project to handle >>> this bundle dep. range for org.slf4j, but who knows when it will be fixed. >>> >>> I am trying in a meantime to omit any bundles from my plugins in >>> release, not sure if that can help. >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2274/console >>> >>> [2]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=573454 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Ondrej, >>> >>> >>> >>> I think your analysis is correct. RAP tools publishes jetty to its p2 >>> site, but does not include the slf4j so just happened to pick it up from >>> Platform until they removed it, now it picks it up from Reddeer. >>> >>> >>> >>> Markus, >>> >>> >>> >>> Not sure what the issues with removing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha is. Do you mean >>> that RAP references it in too many places? If you mean too many projects, >>> then you might be right, but I hope not. Hopefully with rap, wtp, and >>> reddeer making their update we can get rid of it from the 2021-06 release >>> entirely. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nitin, >>> >>> >>> >>> I think the RC2 contribution of WTP only validated because Reddeer is >>> still publishing slf4j 2.0. >>> >>> >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 10:55, Ondrej Dockal <odoc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> Gerrit aggregator validation job [1] is failing for me due to RAP >>> requiring jetty 10.0.3 and that transitively requires slf4j in 2.0.0 +, I >>> guess I have to wait for you to update jetty deps to make it work, right? >>> >>> >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://ci.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/2247/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Knauer <mkna...@eclipsesource.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Switching to Jetty 10.0.4 seems to be doable for RAP, especially because >>> the Webtools team was so kind to give us access to their p2 repository for >>> building. I will try that now. >>> >>> >>> >>> slf4j 2.0.0 is a different issue. It was required until today, and is >>> now referenced in too many places. I am not sure if it will be possible to >>> remove it in a quick and safe manner in a last build towards RC2. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:32, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Eclipse Platform have successfully updated their contribution* (Thanks >>> Sravan, Thomas, Jetty team and anyone else who got this done that I don't >>> know about!) *to SimRel to their RC2a build and that means that Eclipse >>> Platform now no longer contributes the alpha 2.0.0 version. >>> >>> >>> >>> However other projects still are contributing the bundle to simrel >>> because they are republishing parts or all of Platform RC2 or earlier or >>> jetty 10 from other sources. >>> >>> >>> >>> Can both *reddeer *and *rap *projects look at their contribution to >>> ensure that they are not contributing slf4j 2.0.0 alpha to the simrel >>> please. >>> >>> >>> >>> As Platform have updated to Jetty 10.0.4, I also see that *rap* has >>> Jetty 10.0.3 contributed to simrel and *webtools* has 10.0.2 >>> contributed to webtools. *All three versions* are in the simrel output >>> repo! >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Jonah >>> >>> >>> ~~~ >>> Jonah Graham >>> Kichwa Coders >>> www.kichwacoders.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> To unsubscribe from this list, visit >> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > To unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev >
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
