Sounds great.  That way you can wash down that dirty example with a beverage
of your choice. :)

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Mike Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bobby, You should begin that process by taking me to dinner.
>
>  On Oct 9, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Robert Johnson wrote:
>
>  *Rob  *
> **
> I think I agree with everything you said.  The James passage you mention
> seems to promote the idea of doing what you know is right to do, and if you
> know what is right to do, it's right, so you can't do wrong in that case.
> However, the rub in our conversations so far is the application of this
> principle.  The application has been like this: If I *think* that
> practicing Halloween is wrong or if I *think* that eating beans is wrong,
> then it is wrong for me to practice Halloween or to eat beans.  But to apply
> the principle correctly, we'd have to *know* that practicing Halloween is
> wrong or *know* that eating beans is wrong to make it wrong to practice
> Halloween or to eat beans.  And thinking is not necessarily knowing -- they
> are two distinct belief states.  For we can think that *p* and *p* be
> false; but we can't know that *p* and *p* be false, since by definition,
> knowledge entails that the belief is true.  This distinction and difference
> between using thinking and knowing in the application of the verse in James
> is the point I am making.
>
> *Mike*
>
> Sorry for the dirty example.  I needed to think of a case involving
> something clearly wrong -- and child abuse is clearly wrong more so than
> most other offenses.  I agree with everything you've said about Halloween.
> Maybe it would be different in the 60's than it is now, although I regret
> knowing much about the history of the practice of Halloween.  I'm a big
> believer of playing it safe with respect to acting in light of God's will
> and expectations.  Regretfully, I don't always practice this principle, but
> I acknowledge the wisdom of it and aspire to practice it.  Like so many
> things we like to do, Halloween is a grey area of morality -- it's not
> clearly right or clearly wrong.  As Rob and you seem to believe the
> strongest, there seems to be some wrong making properties of Halloween (tied
> to pagan celebration, glorifies evil to some extent).  These properties may
> well be counterbalanced by right making properties (e.g., communal harmony,
> fun).  I'm wondering if we should take the chance of offending God by doing
> anything at this time.  In this context, I would like to suggest that we
> rethink the entire idea of holidays and the Christian involvement in them.
> It's tempting to keep things the way they are, since Christmas and Easter
> have such deep Christian connotations.  Tradition is friction for change, so
> I know that most everybody will be inclined to attack this proposal, but
> here it is.  I think that we should celebrate the resurrection and Christ's
> birth every day as believers, and every week or every gathering as a church,
> and give each other gifts as expressions of love motivated by the Holy
> Spirit.  And we should think about abandoning the traditional American
> holiday system to the extent that it risks offending God.
>
> *Dave*
>
> Let me try this from another angle, and tell me if I'm missing your point.
>
> The point is that she thought what she was doing was wrong, and she was
> incorrect, making her action right, which counterexamples [T].  It doesn't
> matter how she formed the belief that what she was doing is wrong; it only
> matters that she believed that what she was doing was wrong and that our
> intuition is that what she did was actually right.  Does this make better
> sense?
>
> Everything you said about Halloween sounds right to me.
>
>
> Bobby
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Mike Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Rob I have an electric garage door opener for a reason.  :)
>>  On Oct 9, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Robert Long wrote:
>>
>>  Now see... that's twice, Mike, you've mentioned concern about your
>> neighbors.  I'm all for being cautious with my children of course but I've
>> always gone along with them in the neighborhood and got a chance to meet
>> some of my neighbors or at least say hi.  Or when I'm home I get to meet
>> some of the kids in the neighborhood.  It can be a very community type
>> activity inside the neighborhood although granted its not in all....  Get to
>> know your neighbors Butler!! (said with a wink and a smile of course!)
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [crosspointe-discuss] Re: Halloween
>> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:12:09 -0500
>>
>> Bobby,
>> Following your line of thought:  Should we celebrate holidays that we have
>> adapted from Pagan festivals, such as Christmas and Easter?  I agree that
>> "halloween brings a community together and strengthens bonds between each
>> other"; however, I wonder if that were more true within America say 60 years
>> ago? I would contend that practicing halloween in the traditional sense that
>> I have known personally, is not really healthy unless you know your
>> neighbors.  That is why I do like the "community" concept where churches,
>> schools, community centers develop a "harvest festival" of sorts that allows
>> for kids to cycle through booths per se and get candy there.
>> Finally,
>>  thank you for the completely awkward example of chloe and her father.  I
>> felt dirty reading it, Bobby.  :)  (It feels wrong just to put the smily
>> face after it to show that I am being sarcastic)
>>
>>   About Halloween:
>>
>> Is there any evidence that God wants us to abstain from attending or
>> participating pagan festivals?  Would this evoke God's jealousy? My gut
>> reaction to all this is this: Although it is common for evangelical
>> Christians to participate in Halloween and to see nothing wrong with it
>> because they have good motives, it seems that God would honor anyone who
>> used Halloween as an opportunity to show their children (and others) that
>> fun and following the crowd should never come at the expense of our duty to
>> honor and celebrate God alone (or to make any kind of celebration as
>> Theocentric as possible and appropriate).  I'm tempted to say that the safe
>> route would be to skip Halloween on principle and also skip lying to our
>> kids about the existence of Santa for that matter (sorry, that's a little
>> off topic, but not exactly off topic).  Tradition and following the crowd
>> should go out the window when we subject our collective, family will to
>> God's will.
>>
>> With this said, Halloween -- viewed as a community event divorced from any
>> notion of a pagan holiday -- is viewd by most Christians as perfectly
>> benign.  Halloween brings a community together and strengthens bonds between
>> each other.  You can go visit your friends in costumes and have a great deal
>> of fun.  Personally, I have very positive memories of Halloween, and I
>> shrink at the notion that my parents would have denied me them.  However, if
>> they were taking a stand for God and were not wishing to evoke His jealousy,
>> I would have remembered that too, and that may have improved my soul more
>> than the memories.
>>
>> Bobby
>>  On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Robert Johnson <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>  "If I don't think I should be doing it, I shouldn't be doing it" implies
>> that *[T]* *Thinking doing X is wrong makes doing X wrong*.
>>
>> *Chloe and Her Father*
>> **
>> Suppose Chloe the child has an evil, abusive dad that tells her that
>> telling Mom about their little secret is wrong, and on the basis of what her
>> father says, Chloe erroneously believes that telling Mom about their little
>> secret is wrong.  However, because of the little secret, Chloe has an
>> existential knot in her stomach, feeling that that there is something wrong
>> and unnatural about what's going on between her and her father.  So one day,
>> in conflict with her belief that she shouldn't do it, she tells her Mom the
>> little secret.  Chloe's mom assures her that she did the *right*thing by
>> telling her, and so does the judge tell her she did the right thing later
>> when her father is convicted of child abuse of the worst kind.
>>
>> *Analysis*
>>
>> The story, Chloe and Her Father, proves that [T] is false in some cases,
>> making it an exceptioned generalization.  It seems that any time someone
>> mistakenly thinks they are doing the wrong thing always does the right
>> thing.  Another lesson of the story is that our thoughts about our actions
>> do not make them right or wrong.  By contrast, God's thoughts about our
>> actions make them right or wrong.
>>
>> Bobby
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ayuh, we got around to talking about the necessity of feeling bad about
>> something or lamenting / mourning when it is necessary to lead to change.
>> We discussed this on a personal level as well as a community level and
>> mentioned some of the same examples you did.  In case you were worried...
>> lol!
>> I think it was pretty apparent I agree with your viewpoint on Halloween.
>> It can be enjoyed innocently but it can also be taken too far.  To play
>> Devil's advocate though - what is your opinion of passages like Deuteronomy
>> 18:10-12, or 1Thess. 5:21,22, Eph. 5:8-12?  Reading passages like this make
>> me think that hey!  Am I really fighting against a dark holiday by
>> trivializing it or am I participating in something I shouldn't be.  I think
>> it comes down to what we've mentioned in other posts - if I don't think I
>> should be doing it, I shouldn't be doing it (i.e. I shouldn't eat beans if I
>> think it is wrong...).  Are there any holy, pure, Christ-like aspects to
>> Halloween? Hmmm.....
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: [crosspointe-discuss] Re: Halloween
>> > Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:49:03 -0500
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Rob,
>> > In response to the "fuddy-duddy, stick in the mud" statement, I think
>> > that lament is a very real aspect to the Christian faith. Healthy
>> > lament puts our our lives in constant perspective. The essence of
>> > Lament is honesty before God and trusting that he is concerned with
>> > the very real frustrations our lives produce. A majority of psalms
>> > are laments, Jesus laments over the status of Israel in Matthew, not
>> > too mention Paul's lament for Israel in Romans. While it must be
>> > understood that we are not called to fixate on our pain, we are not
>> > called to disregard it as insignificant and necessary. (Not that I am
>> > arguing that this is your position :0 )
>> > In regards to Hallow's Eve, I think it is important to understand the
>> > roots of the holiday and be able to articulate a conversation about
>> > the purpose for it, not too mention All Saints day that follows. That
>> > being said, I feel foolish dressing up, but that has more to do with
>> > me be a "stick in the mud" and not because I am opposed to the
>> > holiday. I do think it is dangerous to take kids out in and encourage
>> > them to knock on a stranger's door for the sake of "candy". That
>> > being said, I think there have been numerous churches, schools, and
>> > local organizations who have created great opportunities for kids to
>> > have fun and a place for adults to take them and feel at ease. Is
>> > this an endorsement of witchcraft, sorcery, and dabbling in dark arts,
>> > I don't think so. But I think this is because I am willing to
>> > honestly talk with my kids about the motivation. To me it's like any
>> > other form of entertainment, it gets out of hand, when we don't keep
>> > it in check.
>> > On Oct 8, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Rob L. wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Follow me on this...
>> > > We were discussing James 4:7-10 this week and one of the things that
>> > > struck me was the admonition by James in 4:9 to lament and mourn and
>> > > weep. Obviously there is some context and the conversation did get
>> > > around to being sorrowful over sin and repentance. I started us out
>> > > though by discussing how this seems a poor way to represent
>> > > Christianity. I really don't like it when Christians come across us
>> > > as fuddy-duddy sticks in the mud when really we are capable of having
>> > > just as much, if not more fun than the world.
>> > > So, this verse caught my eye. One of the topics that came up is
>> > > Halloween and how many Christians want nothing to do with it. I am
>> > > not judging this point of view if anyone has it and in fact respect
>> > > and understand it. I laid out for the class Rob's theory of Holidays
>> > > and thought it might garner some discussion here as well.
>> > > Christmas and Easter have some pagan associations both with the timing
>> > > of the holiday and some of the symbolism. I've always thought that
>> > > the significance of the birth of Christ and the resurrection of Christ
>> > > could not be eliminated/squelched/hushed-up by the forces of darkness
>> > > so they used the strategy of misdirection (in the form of these pagan
>> > > symbols) to minimize and trivialize the significance of these events.
>> > > In kind of a reverse thought process I've kind of always thought that
>> > > dressing up in costumes and handing out candy kind of trivialized and
>> > > minimized the admittedly evil roots of Halloween. Plus! it's fun, and
>> > > you know how we like to justify our fun. Just thought I'd solicit you
>> > > alls thoughts - do you celebrate it? do you feel any guilt over this
>> > > or are you at peace with it being a harmless childrens holiday?
>> > >
>> > > Rob
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Mike Butler, Minister to College and Singles
>> > CrossPointe Church
>> > Happy are the Beggars
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crosspointe Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/crosspointe-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to