Peter Trei wrote: > I'd prefer that the printed receipt be retained at the > polling station, after the voter has had an opportunity to > examine it. This serves two purposes: First, it prevents the > vote selling described above, and second, if a recount is > required, it allows the recount to be done on the basis of a > trustworthy record, already certified by the voter as accurate.
Indeed, that's essential for both the reasons you state. Mercuri's design is for the voter to see the printed receipt behind a glass screen. They then press a "Yes" or "No" button to either vote and send the receipt to the trustworthy record, or void it and send the receipt to the bin. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
