Georg: >Tedd's example doesn't adjust to available window-width at all (except >when forced in Opera), thus the solution is weak by design. I didn't >spell that out, and I really shouldn't have to.
Tedd's example wasn't designed to adjust to window-width -- it was designed to adjust to zoom levels and thus was a strong solution for the problem described -- by design. The point of my example: http://www.sperling.com/examples/zoom1/ was to show that the size of text and the size of graphics (images) could both accommodate zoom levels, not adjust to window widths. If you will note, the layout stays generally the same throughout all zoom levels, as it was designed to do. Now, considering that you think my solution was weak, because it didn't adjust to window-widths, then let's see you design a stronger page such that the size of a graphic adjusts to window-widths. Can you? I thought not. tedd -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://sperling.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
