Georg: >tedd wrote: > > I explain the technique at: http://www.sperling.com/examples/zoom1/ > >I've seen good implementations of em-sized designs, and some >really counter-productive ones. >The good em-sized designs will also scale in relation to browser-window, >so visitors are in control. >Many weak em-sized designs will overflow the window and require sideways >scrolling if font-size is bumped up a bit by the visitor.
Your yardstick to measure the "weak/strong" value of a design is IF the browser's window generates a horizontal scroll bar? If so, then that's your opinion, and my opinion differs. The value of a good design should not be tied to browser's window. As I said before, let's see you design a page such that the graphic resizes as the window-sizes. To my knowledge, it can't be done just using css. Whereas, my example resizes graphics very nicely with different zoom levels. tedd -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://sperling.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
