Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Ian Piper wrote: > > > http://www.tellura.co.uk/index.php > > IE6 is confused by the background-position provided for browsers that > support min/max-width. > > In the IE6 stylesheet make that... > > #leftfauxcol { > background-position: 0 0; > width:100%; > } > > #rightfauxcol { > background-position: 100% 0; > width:100%; > } > > ...and IE6 will cooperate. > > regards > Georg > -- > http://www.gunlaug.no
Very interesting and indeed it shows my error or is that MS error. My standalone copy of IE6 would never had read the real IE6 conditional comments in the first place. This causes no problem to me personally since I getting use to having IE8 corrupting my registry and thus my IE6 version vectors but I will continue on my merry path to test the chaos that can result (and until I have two PCs in running order). It may confused others authors who have have not set up IE8 on a virtual PC and not know that version vectors are corrupted when using conditional comments and none of this is indicated on the IE blog [1] for installing IE8. It's important to be able to test in standalone versions of IE6, IE7 and IE8 and it seems that MS never considered the impact that IE8 could have with testing earlier versions of IE. Another thing that I have now realized is that any request for help with IE6 on this list where conditional comments do appear the code we must now consider if this person is running IE8 on virtual PC or as an overwrite of IE7. It's like a warp labyrinth which we must transverse to see the light. :-) [1] <http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/13/installing-ie8.aspx> Alan http://css-class.com/
______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
