James E. Darfler wrote: > Not quite right for me. The names may not have a corresponding photo and the > photos may not have a corresponding bio. There isn't a one to one here. > > As for keeping the tables, it's what I have been using but I would change to > a more css format if that would work better. Could you steer me in the right > direction?
Well, tables and CSS are not mutually exclusive. That is, they can be used together, though using them for layout is generally frowned upon by the CSS Overlords. You could certainly keep your tables and style them to some extent using CSS. Your tables, however, are in place to supply a certain layout, in place of using CSS. They are failing to do that and that issue lies with the source. In short, because you are using tables for layout, your issue has to be resolved at the source level (where the tables are coded) and not at the style level (where CSS is introduced). I'm not sure why you're so quick to write off the ul based solution. Why not use a "no-photo-available" graphic for actors who have't provided a headshot, and use a span in lieu of an anchor for actors who haven't provided a bio or resume? This would give you a greater separation of content and presentation. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
