Can we please bottom post or comment inline (like below).
Theresa Mesa wrote: > How is it inefficient to add html {height: 100.1%} to your CSS, which > immediately applies this to all pages without so much as a how-do-you-do > (since you are using an external style sheet)? To me, if you like the > aesthetics of not having the nav jump back and forth horizontally, it seems > like the *most* efficient way of doing it. Either the scrollbar is there, or > it's not. If you are centering your page, you are going to have the problem. > You don't notice the scroll bar over there on the side unless the height of > the content makes scrolling necessary. Otherwise, you don't pay attention to > it. Very true. The problems with these two pages. <http://www.applegateelements.com/contact.shtml> <http://www.applegateelements.com/agreement.shtml> is one, the very wide header image and two, the wish to have something centered. I would recommend to Matthew that he has the menu beginning from the left and remove all of this. #menu, #menu a { position:relative; } #menu { border-bottom: 0; float: left; left:50%; margin-bottom:-1px; margin-top: 40px; /* added to push it well below the header */ padding-bottom: 0; } #menu a { right:50%; } #menu a a { right: 0; } > Now you could spend hours (since you are a professed n00b) trying to > absolutely position the nav Theresa, wrong Matthew. > Either that, or don't try to center the page in the browser window. Let it be > flush left. Then it's a non-issue. Precisely. It is easy to center a navigation if there are only so many links. > Theresa -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/