On 1/01/2011 6:07 AM, Al Sparber wrote:
On 12/31/2010 2:00 PM, Guy K. Haas wrote:
On Fri, December 31, 2010 10:49 am, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Nice and snappy in Firefox, but slow as molasses in Opera.
They are purposely slow for demonstration.
I'm not sure if CSS animations or transforms will ever be viable unless
and until browser rendering engines are re-written from the ground up to
support them smoothly.
Transforms can be smooth. Anyway rendering engines may need to be
re-written grounds up to support CSS2.1 correctly. This may in turn
cause the CSS 2.1 specs to be rewritten or more likely fixed up in as
CSS3 or CSS4.
Some folks might not care that a design looks
"rough around the edges", but it would never pass muster with a good
designer.
As our list Chaperon says.
*CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously*
We've been playing around with CSS3 effects, but not
transitions/transformations. Here's a quick example:
http://www.projectseven.com/peeks/tpm2/demos/
And another:
http://www.projectseven.com/peeks/tpm2/demos/page5.htm
It took me a while to find what was transformed. These specs may be in
draft form by when implemented, will revolutionize CSS.
<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/>
<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/>
<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-3d-transforms/>
<http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/>
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
