> On 12/30/10 3:45 PM, Rory Bernstein wrote: >> >> I am using a google-hosted embedded web font called Neuton: >> http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=Neuton&subset=latin
>> My web page that uses it: >> http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive David Laakso wrote: > Ditch Neuton. > Go to Font Squirrel. > <http://www.fontsquirrel.com/> > Download Calluna and install it. > Go back to Font Squirrel and use their fontface generator [expert setting]. > <http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fontface/generator> > Leave the font-weight as normal. > Changing it does not sit well cross browser. > Does this meet the "designers" approval? I wanted to get back to my question about the embedded fonts now that I've gotten over my virus. I like David Laakso's suggestion to substitute the font squirrel "Calluna" font for the google hosted Neuton font. I am going to run that by the designer; that will be fine for that font I suspect. The other font used on the URL I gave above is a font squirrel font, Titillium. Philip Taylor's seamonkey browser is not rendering it at all, falling back on a local font. I am very very concerned about this. I had followed instructions on Nettuts about maximizing the cross-browser rendering of the font squirrel fonts: http://blog.themeforest.net/tutorials/how-to-achieve-cross-browser-font-face-support/ and I was expecting better results. Can I get some feedback from the list about whether people are seeing the san-serif font in the nav (left column), Titillium or not? If it is not working on many browsers, then I have some big problems! http://lettershop.ehclients.com/visual_diary_archive Thanks, Rory ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
