On 28 Oct 2005, at 5:11 pm, Paula Unger wrote: > Regarding the advice to use HTML instead of XHTML: isn't this a bit > reckless? My understanding is that support for HTML will soon > disappear; if you rely on this when browser development is heading so > decidedly away from it, don't you risk creating pages which will be > unreadable by most browsers in a couple of years? I've read that > Microsoft are keen to support CSS 2 with the next release of IE, so > problems you're having with it now may soon be a thing of the past.
HTML (as in html 4.01 strict, as defined here [1]) will soon disappear ? That is new to me. I'd say, HTML is the new black, and will get a renewed lease of life with the work of the WHATWG [2], amongst others. But this has nothing to do with CSS and this list, so we better discuss this on other fora. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/> [2] <http://www.whatwg.org/> Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh <http://emps.l-c-n.com/> ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
