I'm curious to hear why someone would pick html over xhtml from the start. Only time I've used html401 transition doctype vs. xhtml strict is when I'm working with legacy html which may contain deprecated tags.
--- "Eric A. Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 9:18 AM -0400 10/28/05, Felix Miata wrote: > > >Seems like a summary of this ought to be on the > wiki somewhere, but if > >it is already, it's escaped me. It might > technically be off topic, but > >if there, each time it resurfaces on the list it > could easily be halted > >with a redirect there. > > Excellent idea, Felix. Anyone want to volunteer > to write the > page? Remember that you'll need to be as objective > as possible about > the pros and cons of each side of the debate. > Another approach is to > have one person write up the pros of the HTML side, > and someone else > write the pros of the XHTML side. > > -- > Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List > Chaperone > "CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not > taken seriously." > -- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/) > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > Supported by evolt.org -- > http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > Anthony Ettinger ph: (408) 656-2473 web: http://www.apwebdesign.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
