-Caveat Lector-
Brian Redman wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Why can't C-Span's camera show the Senators? When Sen. Tom Harkin
> made his objection to the senators being called "jurors," the
> camera was allowed to show us Harkin. But ordinarily the camera
> is not allowed to show us views of the assembled senators. The
> reasoning behind the disallowal of camera's viewing of senators
> can't be based on the senators being "jurors" (as Harkin made
> clear.) What is the judicial logic that disallows camera views
> of the assembled senators?
They don't want you to see them: dozing, cutting out paper dolls, scratching
themselves, etc. As the adage goes, "One shouldn't watch laws or sausage when
they're being made."
Hawk
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
