-Caveat Lector-
Hey sorry Gavin, yes I was the cause of all this who ha.. I put it more down
to the marvels of the net than a case of bad manners... I was intrigued by
Das's comments and since Sitchen was a topic of discussion on other lists I
sent it to get confirmation or otherwise..Someone sent it on and bla bla.
Hey I got sent the pye post and I thought I would send it back, I am sorry
for having put you in the middle. Heck I did not even look at your name on
the post.
I think you must realise here that the net is the public arena and anything
you post will hang around until it all crashes.
As far as Sitchen goes now, Well the jury is dstill out. On one side there
are those that thinks he rules while on the otherside there are those who
think he is a shape shifting reptile.. I am somewhere in the middle..
I do not agree with Pye's attitude in the post either and hey who is to
really say it was from Pye..
The same thing has happened to a David Icke post as well..
Treat the net as the Akashic records...There is no such thing as a private
email..
Didn't mean to upset you...
Peter
We are about to go on a Journey. All Aboard
http://sites.netscape.net/gsussnzl/homepage
Bargain Books
http://bn.bfast.com/bfast/click/mid1349732?siteid=10734186&bfpage=b
----- Original Message -----
From: Gavin Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 1999 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] A defense of Sitchin
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> First off, I do not know why [EMAIL PROTECTED] is posting e-mail that I
> received from Lloyd Pye in a question I had regarding Dasgoat's comments.
I
> would further ask that [EMAIL PROTECTED] at least be accurate enough,
when
> forwarding an e-mail I hadn't even read yet, to attribute Lloyd Pye's
> comments to him and not start off with my name. Further, in the interest
of
> good manners and a modicum of etiquette, it would behoove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to at least e-mail me first informing me that he received the same message
> from Lloyd Pye and that he will forward it to the list.
>
> Finally, I do not agree with Pye's personal attacks on Dasgoat and
although
> he makes some useful points, he tends to lose some credibility because of
the
> aforementioned attacks. What I would like to know is which scholars have
> criticized Sitchin, what they have said and where they have said it. The
> problem with this whole thing is that Sitchin is one of only about a 100
(is
> that an accurate figure?) or so people who can translate cuneiform, so
> finding somebody who can translate it is very difficult, finding somebody
who
> can translate it and be objective-well, good luck. Gavin.
>
>
>
> In a message dated 10/15/99 4:15:03 AM Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << My Goodness guys, talk about spreading the word..Das's comments have
been
> right around the world..
>
> Peter
>
> A defense of Sitchin. Read the comments and complaints at the bottom,
then
> go up to the top to read my reply.......
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lloydpye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, October 15, 1999 2:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Question Regarding Sitchin
>
>
> >Gavin:
> >
> >Dasgoat sounds like either a wannabe--or possibly even an
> >accredited--scholar who is unable to get his/her own ideas (whatever
they
> >might be) accepted at a popular level (and probably not even at a peer
> >level), so (s)he is outraged (as so many of them are) that someone like
> >Zecharia should have such enormous popular success without going through
> the >>
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing! These are sordid
matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
