> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of nexusmagazine
> Sent: 20 April 2000 13:42
> That was an interesting series of quotations you posted.
>
> I have published and read correspondence from archaeologists who have
> been coerced to falsify data. The particular case I have in mind is one
> where fosilised evidence shows human mammoth hunting in central American
> 250,000 years ago. Geological and carbon dating plus other dating
> techniques ALL confirmed this. The whole team were asked to omit or
> falsify data to maintain funding. One refused, she now lives hand to
> mouth, the other team members who complied all hold good posts in various
> universities. This is NOT an isolated case.
OK. You site this as a fact. Where is your reference for this?.
Who are these 'Archaeologists'?
What form of 'Evidence' are you talking about?,
Who did the carbon dating?,
What other techniques were used?
Who asked the team to falsify data?
Who was it that refused?
What universities now employ these members?
Personally, I think you are talking out of your arse, but I am prepared to
be persuaded otherwise if you can supply the above information.
Now, lets have a look at the rest of this post.
>
> no one wants to stick their head out with contradictory data - it is
> academic suicide.
Wrong. Without innovative thinking and inspiration, we would still be in the
dark ages.
>
> Evolution through species is an obvious nonsense, placing more faith in
> randomness, than Christians even place in God.
> Similarly I am not happy with any existing religious explanations for
> where life on Earth came from.
This sentence clearly shows your own lack of understanding of evolution.
There is nothing random about it. It is called the evolution of species
through natural selection, and it means exactly what it says on the tin.
> Assuming the two choices we are given, ie science or religion are both
> incomplete (or downright wrong), we are only left with one alternative:
>
> a) life was seeded here either accidentally or deliberately by other
> life forms from elsewhere in the omniverse (an omniverse being more than
> one 'space-time continuum universe [multidimensional])
>
OK clever guy, where did the life come from that 'seeded here'?
> b) many original lifeforms were (either accidentally or deliberately)
> erased at various intervals (the 5 mass extinctions) and 'replaced' with
> newer improved models. Using the fossil record (remember also that
> fossils happen as a result of sudden catastrophes, ie catastrophism) we
> find NO transitional species, only complete unique lifeforms.
>
Again, you have an incomplete understanding of this subject.
> c) i conclude that we started off with many more species and lifeforms
> on this planet than we have now. If the theory of evolution is wrong,
> then this also means that the huge number of lifeforms present on Earth
> right now are the 'left overs' of what was not removed during the mass
> extinctions. All life on Earth may well be just 5-10% of what was
> orginally 'put' here. Given mass extinctions, asteroid impacts, climatic
> change, ice ages, solar flares, diseases, interbreeding, wars,
> earthchanges and the like, I'd say we would be lucky to have even 10% of
> the original number of varieties.
>
> The question now is whether life on Earth is a result of accidental
> contamination, or deliberate germination.
>
> And that just applies to physicality. How does one explain intellect,
> emotions, spiritual experiences, psychic experiences etc via a
> evolutionary process?
>
> Conspiracy theories are flourishing in this void of understanding our
> origins.
>
> Creationists conspired to suppress scientists.
> Scientists now conspire to suppress information that contradicts its own
> dogmas. Anomalous and contradictory information should be used to
> further our understanding of life, not hidden away to protect vested
> academic and financial interests.
>
> Maybe it is time to listen to the records of the indigenous cultures of
> this planet. They ALL basically say the same thing.
> 1) Beings from the stars came here and created us/interbred with us
> 2) We had advanced civilisations in our distant past
> 3) We have had regular sudden catastrophes which have reshaped the face
> of our Earth, causing civilisations to disappear completely, and restart
> elsewhere.
>
> What is so silly with the above scenario - it fits ALL the existing and
> the suppressed information that we know of?
I think that basically you are quite harmless, but you could do with some
education.
Silas
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
