-Caveat Lector-
This man's entire life is being destroyed based on speculation and rumor.
It hasn't even been established that a CRIME has been committed. If you do
not wish to step back and ask, "why is this happening to him, and why all the
coverage when there are far more serious matters to scrutinize?" then that's
your business. Amelia's Little Book of Etiquette seems to make room for
revelling in gossip, so I don't feel inspired to take advice on "how to be
above all this gossip" from such a deficient source.
My goal is to remind people how easily ANYONE could be destroyed under such
a ruthless media spotlight, and that we need to retain standards of evidence
before taking part in an orgiastic bloodbath of character assassination like
this.
Pick his life apart AFTER there is evidence that he participated in a
crime, not BEFORE, and certainly not before it's even been established that a
crime EXISTS. Otherwise the atmosphere is ripe for this to happen to you,
your friends, your loved ones, ANYONE. Do you really wish to be party to
creating such a political climate? Was nothing learned from the MacCarthy
years?
Samantha
In a message dated 9/4/01 2:01:18 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The National Enquirer prides itself on being a tabloid but it was
> the first to break the news about Jesse Jackson and has been proven
> accurate a number of times. While it may be controlled by
> intelligence, that does not necessarily mean what it publishes is
> untrue for sometimes a tabloid will print what the mainstream will
> not. Like everything else, the information offered has to be
> considered in the context of what is already known and verified by
> the reader. That is true of any source.
>
> Anyone above all of this gossip would surely delete posts with the
> name of Condit/Levy in the subject line and simple not participate.
> The way to refute claims that one believes to be untrue is to post
> information to the contrary. Otherwise, this is the stuff of which
> conspiracy theories are made. Many times there will not be
> verifiable sources and all should be considered to arrive at the
> big picture with the researcher using their own cache of
> information to arrive at their own conclusions The information
> available from all sources is included in order to arrive at the
> best possible conclusion. Censorship of any source does not
> enhance the process.
> ~Amelia~
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
