-Caveat Lector-

alamaine spotted this on the Guardian Unlimited site and thought you should see it.

To see this story with its related links on the Guardian Unlimited site, go to 
http://www.guardian.co.uk

Sharon tries to neutralise Netanyahu with job offer
Former Israeli prime minister unlikely to accept cabinet post in collapsing government
Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
Friday November 01 2002
The Guardian


Ariel Sharon sought to neutralise the single greatest threat to his chances of 
remaining Israel's prime minister yesterday by inviting his arch-rival and former 
premier, Binyamin Netanyahu, to join the cabinet as foreign minister.

The prime minister and the man with his eye on the post were expected to meet 
yesterday to discuss the offer, but sources in Mr Netanyahu's camp said he was not 
enthusiastic about joining a collapsing government.

The two men are the chief rivals for the nomination to be Likud party candidate for 
prime minister - a directly elected post in Israel - at the next general election. 
That could come within weeks if Mr Sharon is unable to put together a coalition in the 
knesset before a confidence vote on Monday.

The latest poll shows that support for Likud has surged since the last election two 
years ago, mostly because of Mr Sharon's crackdown on the Palestinians in response to 
the suicide bombings. Likud can expect to almost double its number of seats in the 
knesset, while Labour faces losing about a quarter of its members.

That in effect turns the Likud primary into a ballot to decide who will be Israel's 
next prime minister.

"I think Sharon is trying to avoid a bloody leadership fight with Netanyahu," said 
Professor Gerald Steinberg, a political scientist at Bar-Ilan university. "It could 
badly split Likud. Netanyahu has no interest in trying to prop up Sharon, but Sharon's 
card is that if Netanyahu says no he would be portrayed as someone who is abandoning 
his national responsibility."

Some of Mr Sharon's ministers are urging him to call an election immediately because 
he still holds a number of advantages over Mr Netanyahu, but they could fall away. The 
finance minister, Silvan Shalom, and two cabinet colleagues, Ruby Rivlin and Limor 
Livnat, believe a shaky coalition, marred by infighting and inevitable collapse, will 
damage the prime minister.

"It is not certain that Sharon will beat Netanyahu today," Mr Raven told Israeli 
journalists. "But it is certain that every day that goes by reduces Sharon's chances 
of victory."

There are also political dangers in seeking an alliance with the extreme right.

Mr Sharon is looking to a coalition with the National Union-Yisrael Beiteinu amalgam 
of parties to keep him in power. Complicating the issue is the fact that the leader, 
Avigdor Lieberman, is a close ally of Mr Netanyahu. The prime minister's allies fear 
that Mr Lieberman and his party could prove a Trojan horse if he joins the government 
only to trap Mr Sharon by setting up a confrontation over any number of issues dear to 
the right.

For instance, Mr Netanyahu favours expelling Yasser Arafat from the West Bank, while 
Mr Sharon has been dissuaded from doing so by the Americans.

The prime minister is much more trusted than Mr Netanyahu on the issue of the moment: 
security, particularly with war looming in Iraq. On the other hand, Mr Netanyahu is a 
superior political operator who has organised an effective group of campaigners within 
Likud that has already seized control of the party's crucial Jerusalem branches.

"Netanyahu still has an unusual charisma with the party members that he has lost with 
the general public," said Professor Yaron Ezrahi, a political scientist at Hebrew 
university. "Likud people are prone to be impressed by the appearance of strong 
rhetoric and Netanyahu is more extreme than Sharon because Netanyahu is great at 
tapping fear and hatred as political assets. That's not what Sharon does."

And then there is the conduct of the primaries themselves, which have been marred by 
irregularities in the past in both of Israel's major parties.

"The internal processes are not particularly transparent or particularly democratic. 
There is a lot that goes on that no one knows about," Prof Steinberg said.

Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/
 <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/ctrl@;listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to