- which is the latest GHC patch that we need?

The ghc-patch that I sent you a couple days ago. It's a relatively simple patch; you should review it and tell me if I should amend it somehow.

Alternatively, if we wanted to integrate the Haddock work but not change GHC for this release, we could bump the lex/parse/rename version-checks in the Haddock patches to >= 613

here is all the latest patches for GHC and Haddock. Unpull/rollback the last Haddock patch if you want to test *with* the patches to GHC HEAD. I can't get cvs-ghc to accept any patches, so I put them online in
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/

in particular,

current GHC patches:
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/isaacs-GHC-lexParseRenameMove.dpatch

current Haddock patches including last-patch-that-may-be-rollbacked:
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/isaacs-Haddock-patches-with-bump.dpatch

-Isaac

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to