- which is the latest GHC patch that we need?
The ghc-patch that I sent you a couple days ago. It's a relatively
simple patch; you should review it and tell me if I should amend it
somehow.
Alternatively, if we wanted to integrate the Haddock work but not change
GHC for this release, we could bump the lex/parse/rename version-checks
in the Haddock patches to >= 613
here is all the latest patches for GHC and Haddock. Unpull/rollback the
last Haddock patch if you want to test *with* the patches to GHC HEAD.
I can't get cvs-ghc to accept any patches, so I put them online in
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/
in particular,
current GHC patches:
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/isaacs-GHC-lexParseRenameMove.dpatch
current Haddock patches including last-patch-that-may-be-rollbacked:
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/isaacs-Haddock-patches-with-bump.dpatch
-Isaac
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc