Simon Marlow wrote:
The GHC patches look fine, with one wibble: HsDocString should be a
newtype.
I'm happy for this to go into 6.12.1, if we can get everything aligned.
I can't actually apply your patch, because you have various patches
called things like IDRAFT1 in the context - what are those?
Oh odd/oops. I guess I'll just unrecord and re-record it into one patch
(incl. your newtype change)
Here, try this:
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/isaacs-GHC-remove-haddockstuff.dpatch
current Haddock patches including last-patch-that-may-be-rollbacked:
http://isaac.cedarswampstudios.org/2009/haddock-related-patches/isaacs-Haddock-patches-with-bump.dpatch
I'll let David comment on those. I presume that Haddock will continue
to build with older GHCs too?
Yes it will.
So I suggest we proceed as follows:
- get a set of GHC/Haddock patches that I can apply and test
- push the Haddock patches to Haddock HEAD (will break Haddock with
GHC HEAD, but it still works with 6.10.x).
right
- I pull the Haddock patches and test with the GHC patches
good
- I push the GHC/Haddock patches to GHC and GHC's Haddock branch
sounds a good plan
-Isaac
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
