2009/8/24 Isaac Dupree <[email protected]>: > Simon Marlow wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> So we want to get these patches into Haddock/GHC before the 6.12.1 >> release. I'm unfamiliar with the current state, could someone summarise for >> us? >> >> - which patches are in Haddock upstream? > > right now, the latest release doesn't have much of my work at all, and > code.haskell.org HEAD has a version of the cross-package docs code that > works mostly okay but doesn't get those docs quite right, and doesn't even > build on 6.11!(though the fix is trivial) We need to get the rest of my > patches reviewed and committed soon. > >> - are all the issues ironed out now? ie. do you think these >> patches are fit for us to incorporate? > > It seems to work well with HEAD. We need David's opinion too though. (And I > need to test that it's generating enough links, which I think it does with > HEAD which is what is important, but it needs more investigation.) > >> - which is the latest GHC patch that we need? > > The ghc-patch that I sent you a couple days ago. It's a relatively simple > patch; you should review it and tell me if I should amend it somehow. > > Alternatively, if we wanted to integrate the Haddock work but not change GHC > for this release, we could bump the lex/parse/rename version-checks in the > Haddock patches to >= 613
I've finally applied the Haddock patches (except the version bump). I've also pushed a few corrections of minor issues (mostly stylistic ones, so far) and will continue to do that as I look closer at the code. But I think it's ready to go into GHC now. Isaac, one question: you do DeleteTopLevelQuantification on methods, which deletes their contexts. Won't that be problematic when a method has a context which is not also on the class? David _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
