On 06/09/2009 22:39, David Waern wrote:
2009/8/24 Isaac Dupree<[email protected]>:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Hi guys,
So we want to get these patches into Haddock/GHC before the 6.12.1
release. I'm unfamiliar with the current state, could someone summarise for
us?
- which patches are in Haddock upstream?
right now, the latest release doesn't have much of my work at all, and
code.haskell.org HEAD has a version of the cross-package docs code that
works mostly okay but doesn't get those docs quite right, and doesn't even
build on 6.11!(though the fix is trivial) We need to get the rest of my
patches reviewed and committed soon.
- are all the issues ironed out now? ie. do you think these
patches are fit for us to incorporate?
It seems to work well with HEAD. We need David's opinion too though. (And I
need to test that it's generating enough links, which I think it does with
HEAD which is what is important, but it needs more investigation.)
- which is the latest GHC patch that we need?
The ghc-patch that I sent you a couple days ago. It's a relatively simple
patch; you should review it and tell me if I should amend it somehow.
Alternatively, if we wanted to integrate the Haddock work but not change GHC
for this release, we could bump the lex/parse/rename version-checks in the
Haddock patches to>= 613
I've finally applied the Haddock patches (except the version bump).
I've also pushed a few corrections of minor issues (mostly stylistic
ones, so far) and will continue to do that as I look closer at the
code. But I think it's ready to go into GHC now.
I'm validating the patches now. Looks like we need some warning fixes.
David - you probably want to pull from
http://darcs.haskell.org/haddock2, there are a couple of fixes in there
from GHC HEAD.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
