> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:28 AM
> I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was
> that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of
> course, that
> means the setup repository). The standalone rebase.exe
> should be built
> within that project, along with setup.exe which would
> leverage the same
> code.
>
> That way, there's no possibility that the two programs would get
> out-of-sync with respect to the /etc/rebase.conf (?) information and
> file format.
Yes, and at that point we had two issues:
1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't
available - beyond whats in libg++-3.
2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking.
Rob
