> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:45 AM > Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and > install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin > package). Exactly, in fact libstdc++ is required. > Not having looked at Jason's code, I can't comment on the design; > however, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to refactor it > away from STL > and just use "basic" libstdc++ stuff, right? I mean, Jason didn't go > absolutely template-crazy, did he? The design wasn't STL bound, it's more at the pattern level rather than which specific container he used. It's all in the archives. Rob
- rebasing new packages?! Stipe Tolj
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Charles Wilson
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Charles Wilson
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Danny Smith
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Earnie Boyd
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins